Paper detail

Level of helium enhancement among M3's horizontal-branch stars

(Abridged) The color and luminosity distribution of horizontal branch (HB) stars in globular clusters are sensitive probes of their original helium abundances. However, recent analyses based on visual and near-ultraviolet (UV) CMDs have provided conflicting results. To clarify the situation, we address the optimum ranges of applicability (in terms of the $T_{eff}$ range covered by the HB stars) for visual and near-UV CMDs, as far as application of this HB $Y$ test goes. We consider both Stromgren and Hubble Space Telescope (HST) bandpasses. Our results indicate that the distributions of HB stars in the y vs (b-y) plane can be a reliable indicator of the He content in cool blue HB (BHB) stars, particularly when a differential comparison between blue and red HB stars is carried out in the range $T_{eff}<8300$K. Conversely, we demonstrate that CMDs using the F336W filter have a much less straightforward interpretation at the cool end of the BHB, as the distributions of HB stars in the F336W vs (F336W-F555W) plane are affected by a triple degeneracy effect. In other words, the position of an HB star is exactly the same, for a given chemical composition, for multiple combinations of the parameters $Y$, $M_{HB}$, and age along the HB evolutionary track. Other HST UV filters do not appear to be as severely affected by this degeneracy effect, to which visual bandpasses are also immune. We do find, on the other hand, that such near-UV CMDs can be extremely useful for the hottest stars along the cool BHB end. Based on a reanalysis of the distribution of HB stars in the y vs (b-y) plane, we find that the coolest among the BHB stars in M3 are likely enhanced in helium by $ΔY\approx 0.01$, compared with the red HB stars in the same cluster. Using near-UV HST photometry we find evidence of a progressive increase in $Y$ with increasing temperature, reaching $ΔY=0.02$ at $T_{eff}=10900$K.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.