Paper detail

Less is More: Fairness in Wide-Area Proof-of-Work Blockchain Networks

Blockchain is rapidly emerging as an important class of network application, with a unique set of trust, security and transparency properties. In a blockchain system, participants record and update the `server-side' state of an application as blocks of a replicated, immutable ledger using a consensus protocol over the Internet. Mining blocks has become lucrative in recent years; e.g., a miner receives over USD 200,000 per mined block in Bitcoin today. A key factor affecting mining rewards, is the latency of broadcasting blocks over the network. In this paper, we consider the problem of topology design for optimizing mining rewards in a wide-area blockchain network that uses a Proof-of-Work protocol for consensus. Contrary to general wisdom that a faster network is always better for miners, we show a counter intuitive result where a slower network is actually beneficial to some miners. This is because competing miners must choose neighbors that not only decrease their own latency to others, but also ensure that the latency between other miners do not decrease because of itself. We formalize this problem, and provide both theoretical analysis and experimental results to support our claim.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.