Paper detail

Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in $B$-meson decays

Anomalies in (semi)leptonic $B$-meson decays present interesting patterns that might be revealing the shape of the new physics to come. In order to understand the experimental data, we explore symmetry arguments that lead to the hypothesis of minimal flavor violation. In particular, under the assumption of negligible neutrino mass effects in charged lepton processes, the presence of lepton universality violation without lepton flavor violation naturally arises. This can account for a deficit of $B^+\to K^+μμ$ over $B^+\to K^+ee$ decays with new physics coupled predominantly to muons and a new physics scale of a few TeV. A prediction of this scenario is the modification of processes involving the third generation. In particular, accounting for the above ratio implies a large enhancement, by a factor $\sim10^3$ with respect to the standard model, of all the $b\to sττ$ decay rates. Although these are still below current experimental limits, they should be easily at reach in future experiments at $B$-factories. Another important consequence is the prediction of sizable effects in charge-current $B$ tauonic decays which could also explain the enhancements that have been observed in the $B\to D^{(*)}τ\bar ν$ and $B^-\toτ^-\bar ν$ decays. For the most part, the study is carried out in an effective field theory framework with an underlying $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ symmetry that emphasizes the model-independent correlations arising between low- and high-energy observables. For example, a connection between $B$-decays and top physics is pointed out. To complement the discussion, all possible (spin 0 and 1) leptoquark models are matched to the low-energy field theory so that the effective analysis can be used to survey these candidates for new physics. These models also serve as concrete examples where the hypotheses of this work can be implemented.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.