Paper detail

Lepton Number vs Coulomb Super-Criticality

The non-perturbative effects of QED-vacuum reconstruction under influence of a supercritical EM-source ($Z>Z_{cr,1}$) are considered in view of lepton number conservation. The question is here that if the vacuum shells formation and spontaneous positron emission, associated with discrete levels diving into the lower continuum, exist in reality, then it by no means should be a signal of new physics. The reason is that the emitted positrons carry away the lepton number equal to $(-1)\times$their total number, and so the corresponding amount of positive lepton number should be shared by VP-density, concentrated in vacuum shells. In this case instead of integer lepton number of real particles there should appear the lepton number VP-density. Otherwise either the lepton number conservation in such processes must be broken, or the spontaneous positron emission prohibited. The conditions, under which the emission of vacuum positrons can be unambiguously detected on the nuclear conversion pairs background, are also discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.