Paper detail

Leo IV & V - A possible dwarf galaxy pair ?

The last few years have seen the discovery of many faint and ultra-faint dwarf spheroidal galaxies around the Milky Way. Among these is a pair of satellites called Leo IV and Leo V. This pair is found at large distances from the Milky Way (154 and 175 kpc respectively). The rather small difference in radial distance, and the fact that they also show a close projected distance on the sky, has led to the idea that we might be seeing a new pair of bound galaxies - like the Magellanic Clouds. In this paper we investigate this speculation by means of a simple integration code (confirming the results with full N-body simulations). As the luminous mass of both faint dwarfs is far too low to allow them to be bound, we simulate the pair assuming extended dark matter haloes. Our results show that the minimum dark matter mass required for the pair to be bound is rather high - ranging from 1.6 x 10^10 Msun to 5.4 x 10^10 Msun (within the virial radii). Computing the mass of dark matter within a commonly adopted radius of 300 pc shows that our models are well within the predicted range of dark matter content for satellites so faint. We therefore conclude that it could be possible that the two galaxies constitute a bound pair.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.