Paper detail

Lensing and the luminosity of Gamma-ray bursts and their hosts

The quoted intrinsic luminosity of objects has a dependency on the assumed cosmology, and the (less often considered) assumed gravitational lensing due to the matter content of the viewing beam; the so called `filled' or `empty' beam cases. We consider the implications of filled vs empty beam assumptions for the derived total luminosities of recent gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in which counterparts at cosmological distances have been confirmed. Conversion factors between filled and empty beam bolometric luminosities are presented graphically for a range of cosmologies and redshifts. The tendency for sources to be most probably demagnified further supports the need for non-isotropic GRB emission in neutron star merger models, or the need for at least one massive star in other models. In the most extreme case the true energy of GRB971214 at z=3.418 could be as high as ~ 8 x 10^53 ergs, a factor ~ 2 more than previously estimated. Similarly, the effect may account for some of the observed bias towards fainter host magnitudes.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.