Paper detail

Lempert Theorem for stronly linearly convex domains with smooth boundaries

The aim of this paper is to present a detailed and slightly modified version of the proof of the Lempert Theorem in the case of non-planar stronlgy linearly convex domains with C^2 smooth boundaries. The original Lempert's proof is presented only in proceedings of a conference with a very limited access and at some places it was quite sketchy. We were encouraged by some colleagues to prepare an extended version of the proof in which all doubts could be removed and some of details of the proofs could be simplified. We hope to have done it below. Certainly the idea of the proof belongs entirely to Lempert. Additional motivation for presenting the proof is the fact shown recently, that the so-called symmetrized bidisc may be exhausted by stronlgy linearly convex domains. On the other hand it cannot be exhausted by domains biholomorphic to convex ones. Therefore, the equality of the Lempert function and the Carathéodory distance for strongly linearly convex domains does not follow directly from the convex case.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.