Paper detail

Leidenfrost drop impact on inclined superheated substrates

In real applications, drops always impact on solid walls with various inclinations. For the oblique impact of a Leidenfrost drop, which has a vapor layer under its bottom surface to prevent its direct contact with the superheated substrate, the drop can nearly frictionlessly slide along the substrate accompanied by the spreading and the retracting. To individually study these processes, we experimentally observe ethanol drops impact on superheated inclined substrates using high-speed imaging from two different views synchronously. We first study the dynamic Leidenfrost temperature, which mainly depends on the normal Weber number ${We}_\perp $. Then the substrate temperature is set to be high enough to study the Leidenfrost drop behaviors. During the spreading process, drops always keep uniform. And the maximum spreading factor $D_m/D_0$ follows a power-law dependence on the large normal Weber number ${We}_\perp $ as $D_m/D_0 = \sqrt{We_\perp /12+2}$ for $We_\perp \geq 30$. During the retracting process, drops with low impact velocities become non-uniform due to the gravity effect. For the sliding process, the residence time of all studied drops is nearly a constant, which is not affected by the inclination and $We$ number. The frictionless vapor layer results in the dimensionless sliding distance $L/D_0$ follows a power-law dependence on the parallel Weber number $We_\parallel$ as $L/D_0 \propto We_\parallel^{1/2}$. Without direct contact with the substrate, the behaviors of drops can be separately determined by ${We}_\perp $ and $We_\parallel$. When the impact velocity is too high, the drop fragments into many tiny droplets, which is called the splashing phenomenon. The critical splashing criterion is found to be $We_\perp ^*\simeq$ 120 or $K_\perp = We_\perp Re_\perp^{1/2} \simeq$ 5300 in the current parameter regime.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.