Paper detail

Least negative intersections of positive closed currents on compact Kähler manifolds

Let $X$ be a compact Kähler manifold of dimension $k$. Let $R$ be a positive closed $(p,p)$ current on $X$, and $T_1,\ldots ,T_{k-p}$ be positive closed $(1,1)$ currents on $X$. We define a so-called least negative intersection of the currents $T_1,T_2,\ldots ,T_{k-p}$ and $R$, as a sublinear bounded operator \begin{eqnarray*} \bigwedge (T_1,\ldots ,T_{k-p},R):~C^0(X)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}. \end{eqnarray*} This operator is {\bf symmetric} in $T_1,\ldots ,T_{k-p}$. It is {\bf independent} of the choice of a quasi-potential $u_i$ of $T_i$, of the choice of a smooth closed $(1,1)$ form $θ_i$ in the cohomology class of $T_i$, and of the choice of a Kähler form on $X$. Its total mass $<\bigwedge (T_1,\ldots ,T_{k-p},R),1>$ is the intersection in cohomology $\{T_1\}\{T_2\}\ldots \{T_{k-p}\}.\{R\}$. It has a semi-continuous property concerning approximating $T_i$ by appropriate smooth closed $(1,1)$ forms, plus some other good properties. If $p=0$ and $T_1=\ldots =T_k=T$, we have a least negative Monge-Ampere operator $MA(T)=\bigwedge (T,\ldots ,T)$. If the set where $T$ has positive Lelong numbers does not contain any curve, then $MA(T)$ is positive. Several examples are given.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.