Paper detail

Learning useful representations for radio astronomy "in the wild" with contrastive learning

Unknown class distributions in unlabelled astrophysical training data have previously been shown to detrimentally affect model performance due to dataset shift between training and validation sets. For radio galaxy classification, we demonstrate in this work that removing low angular extent sources from the unlabelled data before training produces qualitatively different training dynamics for a contrastive model. By applying the model on an unlabelled data-set with unknown class balance and sub-population distribution to generate a representation space of radio galaxies, we show that with an appropriate cut threshold we can find a representation with FRI/FRII class separation approaching that of a supervised baseline explicitly trained to separate radio galaxies into these two classes. Furthermore we show that an excessively conservative cut threshold blocks any increase in validation accuracy. We then use the learned representation for the downstream task of performing a similarity search on rare hybrid sources, finding that the contrastive model can reliably return semantically similar samples, with the added bonus of finding duplicates which remain after pre-processing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.