Paper detail

Learning to Validate the Quality of Detected Landmarks

We present a new loss function for the validation of image landmarks detected via Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). The network learns to estimate how accurate its landmark estimation is. This loss function is applicable to all regression-based location estimations and allows the exclusion of unreliable landmarks from further processing. In addition, we formulate a novel batch balancing approach which weights the importance of samples based on their produced loss. This is done by computing a probability distribution mapping on an interval from which samples can be selected using a uniform random selection scheme. We conducted experiments on the 300W, AFLW, and WFLW facial landmark datasets. In the first experiments, the influence of our batch balancing approach is evaluated by comparing it against uniform sampling. In addition, we evaluated the impact of the validation loss on the landmark accuracy based on uniform sampling. The last experiments evaluate the correlation of the validation signal with the landmark accuracy. All experiments were performed for all three datasets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.