Paper detail

Learning to segment from misaligned and partial labels

To extract information at scale, researchers increasingly apply semantic segmentation techniques to remotely-sensed imagery. While fully-supervised learning enables accurate pixel-wise segmentation, compiling the exhaustive datasets required is often prohibitively expensive. As a result, many non-urban settings lack the ground-truth needed for accurate segmentation. Existing open source infrastructure data for these regions can be inexact and non-exhaustive. Open source infrastructure annotations like OpenStreetMaps (OSM) are representative of this issue: while OSM labels provide global insights to road and building footprints, noisy and partial annotations limit the performance of segmentation algorithms that learn from them. In this paper, we present a novel and generalizable two-stage framework that enables improved pixel-wise image segmentation given misaligned and missing annotations. First, we introduce the Alignment Correction Network to rectify incorrectly registered open source labels. Next, we demonstrate a segmentation model -- the Pointer Segmentation Network -- that uses corrected labels to predict infrastructure footprints despite missing annotations. We test sequential performance on the AIRS dataset, achieving a mean intersection-over-union score of 0.79; more importantly, model performance remains stable as we decrease the fraction of annotations present. We demonstrate the transferability of our method to lower quality data, by applying the Alignment Correction Network to OSM labels to correct building footprints; we also demonstrate the accuracy of the Pointer Segmentation Network in predicting cropland boundaries in California from medium resolution data. Overall, our methodology is robust for multiple applications with varied amounts of training data present, thus offering a method to extract reliable information from noisy, partial data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.