Paper detail

Learning to Match Mathematical Statements with Proofs

We introduce a novel task consisting in assigning a proof to a given mathematical statement. The task is designed to improve the processing of research-level mathematical texts. Applying Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools to research level mathematical articles is both challenging, since it is a highly specialized domain which mixes natural language and mathematical formulae. It is also an important requirement for developing tools for mathematical information retrieval and computer-assisted theorem proving. We release a dataset for the task, consisting of over 180k statement-proof pairs extracted from mathematical research articles. We carry out preliminary experiments to assess the difficulty of the task. We first experiment with two bag-of-words baselines. We show that considering the assignment problem globally and using weighted bipartite matching algorithms helps a lot in tackling the task. Finally, we introduce a self-attention-based model that can be trained either locally or globally and outperforms baselines by a wide margin.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.