Paper detail

Learning to identify image manipulations in scientific publications

Adherence to scientific community standards ensures objectivity, clarity, reproducibility, and helps prevent bias, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. To help scientific integrity officers and journal/publisher reviewers monitor if researchers stick with these standards, it is important to have a solid procedure to detect duplication as one of the most frequent types of manipulation in scientific papers. Images in scientific papers are used to support the experimental description and the discussion of the findings. Therefore, in this work we focus on detecting the duplications in images as one of the most important parts of a scientific paper. We propose a framework that combines image processing and deep learning methods to classify images in the articles as duplicated or unduplicated ones. We show that our method leads to a 90% accuracy rate of detecting duplicated images, a ~ 13% improvement in detection accuracy in comparison to other manipulation detection methods. We also show how effective the pre-processing steps are by comparing our method to other state-of-art manipulation detectors which lack these steps.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.