Paper detail

Learning the Interference Graph of a Wireless Network

A key challenge in wireless networking is the management of interference between transmissions. Identifying which transmitters interfere with each other is a crucial first step. In this paper we cast the task of estimating the a wireless interference environment as a graph learning problem. Nodes represent transmitters and edges represent the presence of interference between pairs of transmitters. We passively observe network traffic transmission patterns and collect information on transmission successes and failures. We establish bounds on the number of observations (each a snapshot of a network traffic pattern) required to identify the interference graph reliably with high probability. Our main results are scaling laws that tell us how the number of observations must grow in terms of the total number of nodes $n$ in the network and the maximum number of interfering transmitters $d$ per node (maximum node degree). The effects of hidden terminal interference (i.e., interference not detectable via carrier sensing) on the observation requirements are also quantified. We show that to identify the graph it is necessary and sufficient that the observation period grows like $d^2 \log n$, and we propose a practical algorithm that reliably identifies the graph from this length of observation. The observation requirements scale quite mildly with network size, and networks with sparse interference (small $d$) can be identified more rapidly. Computational experiments based on a realistic simulations of the traffic and protocol lend additional support to these conclusions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.