Paper detail

Learning Rhetorical Structure Theory-based descriptions of observed behaviour

In a previous paper, we have proposed a set of concepts, axiom schemata and algorithms that can be used by agents to learn to describe their behaviour, goals, capabilities, and environment. The current paper proposes a new set of concepts, axiom schemata and algorithms that allow the agent to learn new descriptions of an observed behaviour (e.g., perplexing actions), of its actor (e.g., undesired propositions or actions), and of its environment (e.g., incompatible propositions). Each learned description (e.g., a certain action prevents another action from being performed in the future) is represented by a relationship between entities (either propositions or actions) and is learned by the agent, just by observation, using domain-independent axiom schemata and or learning algorithms. The relations used by agents to represent the descriptions they learn were inspired on the Theory of Rhetorical Structure (RST). The main contribution of the paper is the relation family Although, inspired on the RST relation Concession. The accurate definition of the relations of the family Although involves a set of deontic concepts whose definition and corresponding algorithms are presented. The relations of the family Although, once extracted from the agent's observations, express surprise at the observed behaviour and, in certain circumstances, present a justification for it. The paper shows results of the presented proposals in a demonstration scenario, using implemented software.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.