Paper detail

Learning Preferences and User Engagement Using Choice and Time Data

Choice decisions made by users of online applications can suffer from biases due to the users' level of engagement. For instance, low engagement users may make random choices with no concern for the quality of items offered. This biased choice data can corrupt estimates of user preferences for items. However, one can correct for these biases if additional behavioral data is utilized. To do this we construct a new choice engagement time model which captures the impact of user engagement on choice decisions and response times associated with these choice decisions. Response times are the behavioral data we choose because they are easily measured by online applications and reveal information about user engagement. To test our model we conduct online polls with subject populations that have different levels of engagement and measure their choice decisions and response times. We have two main empirical findings. First, choice decisions and response times are correlated, with strong preferences having faster response times than weak preferences. Second, low user engagement is manifested through more random choice data and faster response times. Both of these phenomena are captured by our choice engagement time model and we find that this model fits the data better than traditional choice models. Our work has direct implications for online applications. It lets these applications remove the bias of low engagement users when estimating preferences for items. It also allows for the segmentation of users according to their level of engagement, which can be useful for targeted advertising or marketing campaigns.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.