Paper detail

Learning how to rank from heavily perturbed statistics - digraph clustering approach

Ranking is one of the most fundamental problems in machine learning with applications in many branches of computer science such as: information retrieval systems, recommendation systems, machine translation and computational biology. Ranking objects based on possibly conflicting preferences is a central problem in voting research and social choice theory. In this paper we present a new simple combinatorial ranking algorithm adapted to the preference-based setting. We apply this new algorithm to the well-known scenario where the edges of the preference tournament are determined by the majority-voting model. It outperforms existing methods when it cannot be assumed that there exists global ranking of good enough quality and applies combinatorial techniques that havent been used in the ranking context before. Performed experiments show the superiority of the new algorithm over existing methods, also over these that were designed to handle heavily perturbed statistics. By combining our techniques with those presented in \cite{mohri}, we obtain a purely combinatorial algorithm that answers correctly most of the queries in the heterogeneous scenario, where the preference tournament is only locally of good quality but is not necessarily pseudotransitive. As a byproduct of our methods, we obtain the algorithm solving clustering problem for the directed planted partition model. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first purely combinatorial algorithm tackling this problem.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.