Paper detail

Learning from Irregularly Sampled Data for Endomicroscopy Super-resolution: A Comparative Study of Sparse and Dense Approaches

Purpose: Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables performing an optical biopsy, providing real-time microscopic images, via a probe. pCLE probes consist of multiple optical fibres arranged in a bundle, which taken together generate signals in an irregularly sampled pattern. Current pCLE reconstruction is based on interpolating irregular signals onto an over-sampled Cartesian grid, using a naive linear interpolation. It was shown that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) could improve pCLE image quality. Although classical CNNs were applied to pCLE, input data were limited to reconstructed images in contrast to irregular data produced by pCLE. Methods: We compare pCLE reconstruction and super-resolution (SR) methods taking irregularly sampled or reconstructed pCLE images as input. We also propose to embed a Nadaraya-Watson (NW) kernel regression into the CNN framework as a novel trainable CNN layer. Using the NW layer and exemplar-based super-resolution, we design an NWNetSR architecture that allows for reconstructing high-quality pCLE images directly from the irregularly sampled input data. We created synthetic sparse pCLE images to evaluate our methodology. Results: The results were validated through an image quality assessment based on a combination of the following metrics: Peak signal-to-noise ratio, the Structural Similarity Index. Conclusion: Both dense and sparse CNNs outperform the reconstruction method currently used in the clinic. The main contributions of our study are a comparison of sparse and dense approach in pCLE image reconstruction, implementing trainable generalised NW kernel regression, and adaptation of synthetic data for training pCLE SR.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.