Paper detail

Leading-order hadronic contribution to the electron and muon g-2

I present a new data driven update of the hadronic vacuum polarization effects for the muon and the electron $g-2$. For the leading order contributions I find $a_μ^{\mathrm{had}(1)}=(686.99\pm 4.21)[687.19\pm 3.48]\times 10^{-10}$ based on $e^+e^-$data [incl. $τ$ data], $a_μ^{\mathrm{had}(2)}= (-9.934\pm 0.091) \times 10^{-10}$ (NLO) and $a_μ^{\mathrm{had}(3)}= (1.226\pm 0.012) \times 10^{-10}$ (NNLO) for the muon, and $a_e^{\mathrm{had}(1)}=(184.64\pm 1.21)\times 10^{-14}$ (LO), $a_e^{\mathrm{had}(2)}=(-22.10\pm 0.14)\times 10^{-14}$ (NLO) and $a_e^{\mathrm{had}(3)}=(2.79\pm 0.02)\times 10^{-14}$ (NNLO) for the electron. A problem with vacuum polarization undressing of cross-sections (time-like region) is addressed. I also add a comment on properly including axial mesons in the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution. My estimate here reads $a_μ[a_1,f_1',f_1] \sim ({ 7.51 \pm 2.71}) \times 10^{-11}\,.$ With these updates $a_μ^{\rm exp}-a_μ^{\rm the}=(32.73\pm 8.15)\times 10^{-10}$ a 4.0 $σ$ deviation, while $a_e^{\rm exp}-a_e^{\rm the}=(-1.10\pm 0.82)\times 10^{-12}$ shows no significant deviation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.