Paper detail

Leading Impulse Response Identification via the Weighted Elastic Net Criterion

This paper deals with the problem of finding a low-complexity estimate of the impulse response of a linear time-invariant discrete-time dynamic system from noise-corrupted input-output data. To this purpose, we introduce an identification criterion formed by the average (over the input perturbations) of a standard prediction error cost, plus a weighted l1 regularization term which promotes sparse solutions. While it is well known that such criteria do provide solutions with many zeros, a critical issue in our identification context is where these zeros are located, since sensible low-order models should be zero in the tail of the impulse response. The flavor of the key results in this paper is that, under quite standard assumptions (such as i.i.d. input and noise sequences and system stability), the estimate of the impulse response resulting from the proposed criterion is indeed identically zero from a certain time index (named the leading order) onwards, with arbitrarily high probability, for a sufficiently large data cardinality. Numerical experiments are reported that support the theoretical results, and comparisons are made with some other state-of-the-art methodologies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.