Paper detail

Le Processus Powered Dirichlet-Hawkes comme A Priori Flexible pour Clustering Temporel de Textes

The textual content of a document and its publication date are intertwined. For example, the publication of a news article on a topic is influenced by previous publications on similar issues, according to underlying temporal dynamics. However, it can be challenging to retrieve meaningful information when textual information conveys little. Furthermore, the textual content of a document is not always correlated to its temporal dynamics. We develop a method to create clusters of textual documents according to both their content and publication time, the Powered Dirichlet-Hawkes process (PDHP). PDHP yields significantly better results than state-of-the-art models when temporal information or textual content is weakly informative. PDHP also alleviates the hypothesis that textual content and temporal dynamics are perfectly correlated. We demonstrate that PDHP generalizes previous work --such as DHP and UP. Finally, we illustrate a possible application using a real-world dataset from Reddit.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.