Paper detail

Layering $\partial$-Graphs and Networks

We consider the inverse problem for countable, locally finite electrical networks with edge weights in an arbitrary field. The electrical inverse problem seeks to determine the weights of the edges knowing only the potential and current data of harmonic functions on a set of boundary nodes. Motivated by the results of Curtis-Ingerman-Morrow and de-Verdiere-Gitler-Vertigan and others, we formalize the idea of using layer-stripping and harmonic continuation to solve the inverse problem. Our strategy is to iteratively recover "vulnerable" edges near the boundary, then remove them by deletion or contraction. To recover the vulnerable edge, we set up a clever boundary value problem and solve it using discrete harmonic continuation. We define "scaffolds," a set of oriented edges that models the flow of information in harmonic continuation. We formulate a sufficient geometric condition ("recoverability by scaffolds") for the inverse problem to be solvable using the layer-stripping strategy. Recoverability by scaffolds is preserved under box products, harmonic subgraphs, covering graphs, and more generally under preimages by unramified harmonic morphisms. For critical circular planar graphs, we prove recoverability by scaffolds using the medial graph. We also connect the harmonic continuation process to Baez-Fong's compositional framework for networks and Lam-Pylyavskyy's electrical linear group. We use this to generalize results of Curtis-Ingerman-Morrow and de-Verdiere-Gitler-Vertigan relating the size of connections through the graph and the rank of submatrices of the response matrix. We give a symplectic characterization of the boundary behavior for networks and the electrical linear group, valid for fields other than $\mathbb{F}_2$. Many of our results also generalize to the nonlinear networks such as those of Johnson.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.