Paper detail

Law of large numbers for critical first-passage percolation on the triangular lattice

We study the site version of (independent) first-passage percolation on the triangular lattice $\mathbb{T}$. Denote the passage time of the site $v$ in $\mathbb{T}$ by $t(v)$, and assume that $P(t(v)=0)=P(t(v)=1)=1/2$. Denote by $a_{0,n}$ the passage time from $\textbf{0}$ to $(n,0)$, and by $b_{0,n}$ the passage time from $\textbf{0}$ to the halfplane $\{(x,y):x\geq n\}$. We prove that there exists a constant $0<μ<\infty$ such that as $n\rightarrow\infty$, $a_{0,n}/\log n\rightarrow μ$ in probability and $b_{0,n}/\log n\rightarrow μ/2$ almost surely. This result confirms a prediction of Kesten and Zhang (Probab. Theory Relat. Fields \textbf{107}: 137--160, 1997). The proof relies on the existence of the full scaling limit of critical site percolation on $\mathbb{T}$, established by Camia and Newman.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.