Paper detail

Lattice understanding of the Delta I=1/2 rule & some implications

After decades of intensive efforts, lattice methods finally revealed one clear source of the large enhancement of the ratio $Re A_0/Re A_2$ \cite{RBC_UKQCD_PRL13}, which has been a puzzle in particle physics for about sixty years. Lattice studies of direct $K \to ππ$ in the $I=2$ channel show that in fact this channel clearly suffers from a severe suppression due to a significant cancellation between the two amplitudes for the original, charged current (tree) operator. % [($\bar s_αγ_mu (1 - γ_5) u_α)(\bar u_βγ_mu(1-gamma_5)d_β$)], One of these amplitudes goes as N and the other one goes as $N^2$, where $N=3$ for QCD. For physical pion masses the cancellation between the two contributions towards $Re A_2$ is about $70\%$. This appreciable cancellation suggests that expectations from large N for QCD may be amenable to receiving significant corrections. The penguin operators seem to make a small contribution to $ReA_0$ at a scale $\gsim 1.5 GeV$. Possible repercussions of the lattice observation for other decays are briefly discussed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.