Abstract
The accurate approximation of critical strains for lattice instability is a key criterion for predictive computational modeling of materials. In this paper, we present a comparison of the lattice stability for atomistic chains modeled by the embedded atom method (EAM) with their approximation by local Cauchy-Born models. We find that both the volume-based local model and the reconstruction-based local model can give O(1) errors for the critical strain since the embedding energy density is generally strictly convex. The critical strain predicted by the volume-based model is always larger than that predicted by the atomistic model, but the critical strain for reconstruction-based models can be either larger or smaller than that predicted by the atomistic model.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.