Paper detail

Lattice QCD matrix elements for the ${B_s^0-\bar{B}_s^0}$ width difference beyond leading order

Predicting the $B_s^0-\bar{B}_s^0$ width difference $ΔΓ_s$ relies on the heavy quark expansion and on hadronic matrix elements of $ΔB=2$ operators. We present the first lattice QCD results for matrix elements of the dimension-7 operators $R_{2,3}$ and linear combinations $\tilde{R}_{2,3}$ using nonrelativistic QCD for the bottom quark and a highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) action for the strange quark. Computations use MILC ensembles of gauge field configuations with $2+1+1$ flavors of sea quarks with the HISQ discretization, including lattices with physically light up/down quark masses. We discuss features unique to calculating matrix elements of these operators and analyze uncertainties from series truncation, discretization, and quark mass dependence. Finally we report the first Standard Model determination of $ΔΓ_s$ using lattice QCD results for all hadronic matrix elements through $\mathcal{O}(1/m_b)$. The main result of our calculations yields the $1/m_b$ contribution $ΔΓ_{1/m_b} = -0.022(10)~\mathrm{ps}^{-1}$. Adding this to the leading order contribution, the Standard Model prediction is $ΔΓ_s = 0.092(14)~\mathrm{ps}^{-1}$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.