Paper detail

Lattice decompositions through methods using congruence relations

It is well known by analysts that a concept lattice has an exponential size in the data. Thus, as soon as he works with real data, the size of the concept lattice is a fundamental problem. In this chapter, we propose to investigate factor lattices as a tool to get meaningful parts of the whole lattice. These factor lattices have been widely studied from the early theory of lattices to more recent work in the FCA field. This chapter is divided into three parts. In the first part, we present pieces of lattice theory and formal concept analysis, namely compatible sub-contexts, arrow-closed sub-contexts and congruence relations, all three notions used for the sub-direct decomposition and the doubling convex construction used for the second decomposition, also based on congruence relations. In the second part, the subdirect decomposition into subdirectly irreducible factor is given, polynomial algorithms to compute such a decomposition are given and an example is detailled to illustrate the theory. Then in the third section, a new decomposition named "revese doubling construction" is given. An example is given to explain this decomposition. Theoretical results are given and proofs for the new ones also.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.