Paper detail

Late-time near-infrared observations of SN 2005df

We present late-time ($200-400$ days) near-infrared spectral evolution for the Type Ia supernova SN 2005df. The spectra show numerous strong emission features of [CoII], [CoIII], and [FeII] throughout the $0.8-1.8$μm region. As the spectrum ages, the cobalt features fade as would be expected from the decay of $^{56}$Co to $^{56}$Fe. We show that the strong and isolated [FeII] emission line at $1.644$μm provides a unique tool to analyze near-infrared spectra of Type Ia supernovae. Normalization of spectra to this line allows separation of features produced by stable versus unstable isotopes of iron group elements. We develop a new method of determining the initial central density, $ρ_c$, and the magnetic field, $B$, of the white dwarf using the width of the $1.644$μm line. The line width is sensitive because of electron capture in the early stages of burning, which increases as a function of density. The sensitivity of the line width to $B$ increase with time and the effects of the magnetic field shift towards later times with decreasing $ρ_c$. The initial central density for SN 2005df is measured as $ρ_c=0.9(\pm0.2)$ (in $10^9$g/cm$^3$), which corresponds to a white dwarf close to the Chandrasekhar mass ($\rm M_{Ch}$) with $\rm M_{WD}=1.313(\pm0.034)$M$_{\odot}$ and systematic error less than $0.04$M$_{\odot}$. Within $\rm M_{Ch}$ explosions, however, the central density found for SN 2005df is very low for a H-accretor, possibly suggesting a helium star companion or a tidally-disrupted white dwarf companion. As an alternative, we suggest mixing of the central region. We find some support for high initial magnetic fields of strength $10^6$G for SN 2005df, however, $0$G cannot be ruled out because of noise in the spectra combined with low $ρ_c$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.