Paper detail

Large uncertainties in the cross section of elastic $ W_L^+ W_L^- $ scattering

The amplitudes for $2\rightarrow 2$ scattering processes involving longitudinally polarized gauge bosons $( W_L^\pm, Z_L )$ and the Higgs boson are analyzed up to two loops. Assuming $M_H >> M_W$, the trilinear Higgs coupling, $λv$, is dominant for energies of $\sqrt{s}$ < 1.5 -- 2 $M_H$. For larger values of $\sqrt{s}$, the quartic coupling, $λ$, becomes dominant, allowing for a simpler calculation of higher-order corrections. The high-energy amplitudes display a large logarithmic dependence on $\sqrt{s}$ which can be resummed using renormalization group techniques. The resummation of leading-log terms is sufficient for Higgs masses of less than 350 GeV. For 350 < $M_H$ < 450 GeV, a next-to-leading-log resummation is necessary. For even larger values of $M_H$, the perturbative approach fails completely since two-loop terms become in magnitude larger than one-loop terms. Choosing the $\overline{\rm MS}$ renormalization scheme instead of the OMS scheme, the coefficients of the perturbative series increase in magnitude, making the breakdown of perturbation theory even more apparent. In conclusion, the Standard Model cross sections presented here have very large uncertainties if $M_H\gtrsim 450$ GeV and $\sqrt{s} \gtrsim 2 M_H$, reducing the sensitivity to contributions from new physics significantly.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.