Paper detail

Large Thermoelectric Power Factor in P-type Si (110)/[110] Ultra-Thin-Layers Compared to Differently Oriented Channels

Using atomistic electronic structure calculations and Boltzmann semi-classical transport we compute the thermoelectric power factor of ultra-thin-body p-type Si layers of thicknesses from W=3nm up to 10nm. We show that the power factor for channels in [110] transport orientation and strong (110) surface confinement largely outperforms all differently oriented channels by more than 2X. Furthermore, the power factor in this channel increases by ~40% with layer thickness reduction. This increase, together with the large confinement effective mass of the (110) surface, make this particular channel less affected by the detrimental effects of enhanced surface roughness scattering and distortion at the nanoscale. Our results, therefore, point towards the optimal geometrical features regarding orientation and length scale for power factor improvement in 2D thin-layers of zincblende semiconductors.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.