Paper detail

Large systems of random linear equations with non-negative solutions: Characterizing the solvable and unsolvable phase

Large systems of linear equations are ubiquitous in science. Quite often, e.g. when considering population dynamics or chemical networks, the solutions must be non-negative. Recently, it has been shown that large systems of random linear equations exhibit a sharp transition from a phase, where a non-negative solution exists with probability one, to one where typically no such solution may be found. The critical line separating the two phases was determined by combining Farkas' lemma with the replica method. Here, we show that the same methods remain viable to characterize the two phases away from criticality. To this end we analytically determine the residual norm of the system in the unsolvable phase and a suitable measure of robustness of solutions in the solvable one. Our results are in very good agreement with numerical simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.