Paper detail

Large-Scale Simulations of Diffusion-Limited n-Species Annihilation

We present results from computer simulations for diffusion-limited $n$-species annihilation, $A_i+A_j\to0$ $(i,j=1,2,...,n;i\neq j)$, on the line, for lattices of up to $2^{28}$ sites, and where the process proceeds to completion (no further reactions possible), involving up to $10^{15}$ time steps. These enormous simulations are made possible by the renormalized reaction-cell method (RRC). Our results suggest that the concentration decay exponent for $n$ species is $\a(n)=(n-1)/2n$ instead of $(2n-3)/(4n-4)$, as previously believed, and are in agreement with recent theoretical arguments \cite{tauber}. We also propose a scaling relation for $Δ$, the correction-to-scaling exponent for the concentration decay; $c(t)\sim t^{-\a}(A+Bt^{-Δ})$.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.