Paper detail

Large Scale Power Spectrum from Peculiar Velocities Via Likelihood Analysis

The power spectrum (PS) of {\it mass} density fluctuations, independent of ``biasing", is estimated from the Mark3 Catalog of Peculiar Velocities of galaxies using Bayesian statistics. A parametric model is assumed for the PS, and the free parameters are determined by maximizing the posterior probability of the model given the data. The method has been tested using detailed mock catalogs. We use generalized CDM models with and without COBE normalization. The robust result for all the models tested is $P(k) Ω^{1.2} = (4.1 \pm 0.7)x10^3 (Mpc h^{-1})^3$ at $k=0.1 h Mpc^{-1}$, with the peak constrained to the range $0.03 < k < 0.06 h Mpc^{-1}$. It is consistent with a direct computation of the PS (Kolatt \& Dekel 1996). When compared to galaxy-density surveys, the implied values for $β$ ($\equiv Ω^{0.6}/b$) are of order unity to within 25\%. A $Γ$-shape model, free of COBE normalization, is constrained by the velocity data to $Γ=0.5\pm 0.15$ and $σ_8 Ω^{0.6}=0.85\pm 0.1$. Within the family of COBE-normalized CDM models, the best tilted model ($Ω=1$, $n \approx 0.84 h_{50}^{-0.65}$) and the best open model ($n=1$, $Ω\approx 0.75 h_{50}^{-1.0}$) are more likely than the best $Λ$ model ($n=1$, $Λ=1-Ω$, $Ω\approx 0.70 h_{50}^{-1.2}$). The most likely CDM model with $Ω\leq 1$ is found to be of $Ω=1$, $h\approx 0.75$, and a {\it tilted} spectrum of $n= 0.8\pm 0.02$ with tensor fluctuations.The tightest constraint for the tilted-$Λ$ models is of the sort $Ωh_{50}^{1.2} n^ν= 0.7 \pm 0.08$, with $ν=3.8$ and $1.85$ with and without tensor fluctuations respectively.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.