Paper detail

Large-scale inhomogeneities of the intracluster medium: improving mass estimates using the observed azimuthal scatter

Using a set of hydrodynamical simulations of 62 galaxy clusters and groups we study the ICM of inhomogeneities, focusing on the ones on the large scale that, unlike clumps, are the most difficult to identify. To this purpose we introduce the concept of residual clumpiness, C_R, that quantifies the large-scale inhomogeneity of the ICM. After showing that this quantity can be robustly defined for relaxed systems, we characterize how it varies with radius, mass and dynamical state of the halo. Most importantly, we observe that it introduces an overestimate in the determination of the density profile from the X-ray emission, which translates into a systematic overestimate of 6 (12)% in the measurement of M_gas at R_200 for our relaxed (perturbed) cluster sample. At the same time, the increase of C_R with radius introduces also a ~2% systematic underestimate in the measurement of the hydrostatic-equilibrium mass (M_he), which adds to the previous one generating a systematic ~8.5% overestimate in f_gas in our relaxed sample. Since the residual clumpiness of the ICM is not directly observable, we study its correlation with the azimuthal scatter in the X-ray surface brightness of the halo and in the y-parameter profiles. We find that their correlation is highly significant (r_S = 0.6-0.7), allowing to define the azimuthal scatter measured in the X-ray surface brightness profile and in the y-parameter as robust proxies of C_R. After providing a function that connects the two quantities, we obtain that correcting the observed gas density profiles using the azimuthal scatter eliminates the bias in the measurement of M_gas for relaxed objects, which becomes (0+/-2)% up to 2R_200, and reduces it by a factor of 3 for perturbed ones. This method allows also to eliminate the systematics on the measurements of M_he and f_gas, although a significant halo to halo scatter remains. (abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.