Paper detail

Large-scale influence of numerical noises as artificial stochastic disturbances on a sustained turbulence

We investigate the large-scale influence of numerical noises as tiny artificial stochastic disturbances on a sustained turbulence. Using the two-dimensional (2D) turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard (RB) convection as an example, we numerically solve the NS equations, separately, by means of a traditional algorithm with double precision (marked by RKwD) and the so-called clean numerical simulation (CNS). The numerical simulation given by the RKwD is a mixture of the "true" physical solution and the "false" numerical noises that is random and can be regarded as a kind of artificial stochastic disturbances: unfortunately, the "true" physical solution is mostly at the same level as the "false" numerical noises. By contrast, the CNS can greatly reduce the background numerical noise to any a required level so that the "false" numerical noises are negligible compared with the "true" physical solution and thus the CNS solution can be used as a "clean" benchmark solution for comparison. It is found that the numerical noises as tiny artificial stochastic disturbances could indeed lead to large-scale deviations of simulations not only in spatio-temporal trajectories but also even in statistics. Especially, these numerical noises (as artificial stochastic disturbances) even lead to different types of flows: the shearing convection occurs for the RKwD simulations, and its corresponding flow field turns to a kind of zonal flow thereafter, however the CNS benchmark solution always sustains the non-shearing vortical/roll-like convection during the whole process of simulation. Thus, we provide a rigorous evidence that numerical noises as a kind of small-scale artificial stochastic disturbances have quantitatively and qualitatively large-scale influences on a sustained turbulence, i.e. the 2D turbulent RB convection considered in this paper.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.