Paper detail

Large-scale fluctuations in the cosmic ionising background: the impact of beamed source emission

When modelling the ionisation of gas in the intergalactic medium after reionisation, it is standard practice to assume a uniform radiation background. This assumption is not always appropriate; models with radiative transfer show that large-scale ionisation rate fluctuations can have an observable impact on statistics of the Lyman-alpha forest. We extend such calculations to include beaming of sources, which has previously been neglected but which is expected to be important if quasars dominate the ionising photon budget. Beaming has two effects: first, the physical number density of ionising sources is enhanced relative to that directly observed; and second, the radiative transfer itself is altered. We calculate both effects in a hard-edged beaming model where each source has a random orientation, using an equilibrium Boltzmann hierarchy in terms of spherical harmonics. By studying the statistical properties of the resulting ionisation rate and HI density fields at redshift $z\sim 2.3$, we find that the two effects partially cancel each other; combined, they constitute a maximum $5\%$ correction to the power spectrum $P_{\mathrm{HI}}(k)$ at $k=0.04 \, h/\mathrm{Mpc}$. On very large scales ($k<0.01\, h/\mathrm{Mpc}$) the source density renormalisation dominates; it can reduce, by an order of magnitude, the contribution of ionising shot-noise to the intergalactic HI power spectrum. The effects of beaming should be considered when interpreting future observational datasets.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.