Paper detail

Large number of receptors may reduce cellular response time variation

Cells often have tens of thousands of receptors, even though only a few activated receptors can trigger full cellular responses. Reasons for the overabundance of receptors remain unclear. We suggest that, in certain conditions, the large number of receptors results in a competition among receptors to be the first to activate the cell. The competition decreases the variability of the time to cellular activation, and hence results in a more synchronous activation of cells. We argue that, in simple models, this variability reduction does not necessarily interfere with the receptor specificity to ligands achieved by the kinetic proofreading mechanism. Thus cells can be activated accurately in time and specifically to certain signals. We predict the minimum number of receptors needed to reduce the coefficient of variation for the time to activation following binding of a specific ligand. Further, we predict the maximum number of receptors so that the kinetic proofreading mechanism still can improve the specificity of the activation. These predictions fall in line with experimentally reported receptor numbers for multiple systems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.