Paper detail

Large, negative threshold contributions to light soft masses in models with Effective Supersymmetry

Threshold contributions to light scalar soft masses due to heavy sparticles (possibly including a heavy Higgs mostly aligned with H_d) in Effective SUSY scenarios are dominated by two-loop diagrams involving gauge couplings. This is due to the fact that in the limit in which the heavy states are degenerate, their one-loop contributions to the light soft masses only depend on small Yukawas and the hypercharge coupling. The two-loop threshold corrections involving only gauge couplings are calculated accounting for nonzero gaugino and light squark masses and shown to be negative, and rather large (δm^2_{t,L}\sim-480^2 GeV^2 for heavy sparticles with masses around 10 TeV). The effect on tachyon bounds is revisited with calculations implementing decoupling. It is pointed out that models yielding Effective SUSY spectra using gaugino mediation require in general very heavy gluinos or a very low SUSY breaking scale in order to avoid tachyons (e.g. for heavy squarks at 10 TeV and a SUSY breaking scale of 125 TeV, minimal scenarios require \tilde m_3 >=2 TeV at 500 GeV, while nonminimal ones demand \tilde m_3 >= 8 TeV).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.