Paper detail

Large Diffeomorphisms in (2+1)-Quantum Gravity on the Torus

The issue of how to deal with the modular transformations -- large diffeomorphisms -- in (2+1)-quantum gravity on the torus is discussed. I study the Chern-Simons/connection representation and show that the behavior of the modular transformations on the reduced configuration space is so bad that it is possible to rule out all finite dimensional unitary representations of the modular group on the Hilbert space of $L^2$-functions on the reduced configuration space. Furthermore, by assuming piecewise continuity for a dense subset of the vectors in any Hilbert space based on the space of complex valued functions on the reduced configuration space, it is shown that finite dimensional representations are excluded no matter what inner-product we define in this vector space. A brief discussion of the loop- and ADM-representations is also included.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.