Paper detail

Large Deviations of Non-Stochastic Interacting Particles on Sparse Random Graphs

This paper concerns the large deviations of a system of interacting particles on a random graph. There is no stochasticity, and the only sources of disorder are the random graph connections, and the initial condition. The average number of afferent edges on any particular vertex must diverge to infinity as $N\to \infty$, but can do so at an arbitrarily slow rate. These results are thus accurate for both sparse and dense random graphs. A particular application to sparse Erdos-Renyi graphs is provided. The theorem is proved by pushing forward a Large Deviation Principle for a `nested empirical measure' generated by the initial conditions to the dynamics. The nested empirical measure can be thought of as the density of the density of edge connections: the associated weak topology is more coarse than the topology generated by the graph cut norm, and thus there is a broader range of application.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.