Paper detail

Large deviations for the largest eigenvalue of Gaussian networks with constant average degree

Large deviation behavior of the largest eigenvalue $λ_1$ of Gaussian networks (Erdős-Rényi random graphs $\mathcal{G}_{n,p}$ with i.i.d. Gaussian weights on the edges) has been the topic of considerable interest. Recently in [6,30], a powerful approach was introduced based on tilting measures by suitable spherical integrals, particularly establishing a non-universal large deviation behavior for fixed $p<1$ compared to the standard Gaussian ($p=1$) case. The case when $p\to 0$ was however completely left open with one expecting the dense behavior to hold only until the average degree is logarithmic in $n$. In this article we focus on the case of constant average degree i.e., $p=\frac{d}{n}$. We prove the following results towards a precise understanding of the large deviation behavior in this setting. 1. (Upper tail probabilities): For $δ>0,$ we pin down the exact exponent $ψ(δ)$ such that $$\mathbb{P}(λ_1\ge \sqrt{2(1+δ)\log n})=n^{-ψ(δ)+o(1)}.$$ Further, we show that conditioned on the upper tail event, with high probability, a unique maximal clique emerges with a very precise $δ$ dependent size (takes either one or two possible values) and the Gaussian weights are uniformly high in absolute value on the edges in the clique. Finally, we also prove an optimal localization result for the leading eigenvector, showing that it allocates most of its mass on the aforementioned clique which is spread uniformly across its vertices. 2. (Lower tail probabilities): The exact stretched exponential behavior of $\mathbb{P}(λ_1\le \sqrt{2(1-δ)\log n})$ is also established. As an immediate corollary, we get $λ_1 \approx \sqrt{2 \log n}$ typically, a result that surprisingly appears to be new. A key ingredient is an extremal spectral theory for weighted graphs obtained via the classical Motzkin-Straus theorem.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.