Paper detail

Langevin dynamics of vortex lines in the counterflowing He II. Talk given at the Low Temperature Conference, Kazan, 2015

The problem of the statistics of a set of chaotic vortex lines in a counterflowing superfluid helium is studied. We introduced a Langevin-type force into the equation of motion of the vortex line in presence of relative velocity $\mathbf{v_{ns}}$. This random force is supposed to be Gaussian satisfying the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. The corresponding Fokker-Planck equation for probability functional in the vortex loop configuration space is shown to have a solution in the form of Gibbs distribution with the substitution $E\{\mathbf{s\}\rightarrow }E(\{\mathbf{% s\}-P(v_{n}-v_{s})}$, where $E\{\mathbf{s\}}$ is the energy of the vortex configuration $\{\mathbf{s\}}$, and $\mathbf{P}$ is the Lamb impulse. Some physical consequences of this fact are discussed.\\ \newline PACS numbers: 47.32.C- (Vortex dynamics) 47.32.cf (Vortex reconnection and rings), 47.37.+q (Hydrodynamic aspects of superfluidity)

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.