Paper detail

Landscape modification meets spin systems: from torpid to rapid mixing, tunneling and annealing in the low-temperature regime

Given a target Gibbs distribution $π^0_β \propto e^{-β\mathcal{H}}$ to sample from in the low-temperature regime on $Σ_N := \{-1,+1\}^N$, in this paper we propose and analyze Metropolis dynamics that instead target an alternative distribution $π^{f}_{α,c,1/β} \propto e^{-\mathcal{H}^{f}_{α,c,1/β}}$, where $\mathcal{H}^{f}_{α,c,1/β}$ is a transformed Hamiltonian whose landscape is suitably modified and controlled by the parameters $f,α,c$ and $β$ and shares the same set of stationary points as $\mathcal{H}$. With appropriate tuning of these parameters, the major advantage of the proposed Metropolis dynamics on the modified landscape is that it enjoys an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ critical height while its stationary distribution $π^{f}_{α,c,1/β}$ maintains close proximity with the original target $π^0_β$ in the low-temperature. We prove rapid mixing and tunneling on the modified landscape with polynomial dependence on the system size $N$ and the inverse temperature $β$, while the original Metropolis dynamics mixes torpidly with exponential dependence on the critical height and $β$. In the setting of simulated annealing, we prove its long-time convergence under a power-law cooling schedule that is faster than the typical logarithmic cooling in the classical setup. We illustrate our results on a host of models including the Ising model on various deterministic and random graphs as well as Derrida's Random Energy Model. In these applications, the original dynamics mixes torpidly while the proposed dynamics on the modified landscape mixes rapidly with polynomial dependence on both $β$ and $N$ and find the approximate ground state provably in $\mathcal{O}(N^4)$ time. This paper highlights a novel use of the geometry and structure of the landscape to the design of accelerated samplers or optimizers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.