Paper detail

Landmark detection in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using A Convolutional Neural Network

Purpose: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) solution for robust landmark detection in cardiac MR images. Methods: This retrospective study included cine, LGE and T1 mapping scans from two hospitals. The training set included 2,329 patients and 34,019 images. A hold-out test set included 531 patients and 7,723 images. CNN models were developed to detect two mitral valve plane and apical points on long-axis (LAX) images. On short-axis (SAX) images, anterior and posterior RV insertion points and LV center were detected. Model outputs were compared to manual labels by two operators for accuracy with a t-test for statistical significance. The trained model was deployed to MR scanners. Results: For the LAX images, success detection was 99.8% for cine, 99.4% for LGE. For the SAX, success rate was 96.6%, 97.6% and 98.9% for cine, LGE and T1-mapping. The L2 distances between model and manual labels were 2 to 3.5 mm, indicating close agreement between model landmarks to manual labels. No significant differences were found for the anterior RV insertion angle and LV length by the models and operators for all views and imaging sequences. Model inference on MR scanner took 610ms/5.6s on GPU/CPU, respectively, for a typical cardiac cine series. Conclusions: This study developed, validated and deployed a CNN solution for robust landmark detection in both long and short-axis CMR images for cine, LGE and T1 mapping sequences, with the accuracy comparable to the inter-operator variation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.