Paper detail

Lack of null-controllability for the fractional heat equation and related equations

We consider the equation $(\partial_t + ρ(\sqrt{-Δ}))f(t,x) = \mathbf 1_ωu(t,x)$, $x\in \mathbb R$ or $\mathbb T$. We prove it is not null-controllable if $ρ$ is analytic on a conic neighborhood of $\mathbb R_+$ and $ρ(ξ) = o(|ξ|)$. The proof relies essentially on geometric optics, i.e.\ estimates for the evolution of semiclassical coherent states. The method also applies to other equations. The most interesting example might be the Kolmogorov-type equation $(\partial_t -\partial_v^2 + v^2\partial_x)f(t,x,v) = \mathbf 1_ωu(t,x,v)$ for $(x,v)\in Ω_x\times Ω_v$ with $Ω_x = \mathbb R$ or $\mathbb T$ and $Ω_v = \mathbb R$ or $(-1,1)$. We prove it is not null-controllable in any time if $ω$ is a vertical band $ω_x\times Ω_v$. The idea is to remark that, for some families of solutions, the Kolmogorov equation behaves like the rotated fractional heat equation $(\partial_t + \sqrt i(-Δ)^{1/4})g(t,x) = \mathbf 1_ωu(t,x)$, $x\in \mathbb T$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.