Paper detail

LABOCA observations of giant molecular clouds in the south west region of the Small Magellanic Cloud

The amount of molecular gas is a key for understanding the future star formation in a galaxy. Because H2 is difficult to observe directly in dense and cold clouds, tracers like CO are used. However, at low metallicities especially, CO only traces the shielded interiors of the clouds. mm dust emission can be used as a tracer to unveil the total dense gas masses. The comparison of masses deduced from the continuum SIMBA 1.2 mm emission and virial masses in a sample of giant molecular clouds (GMCs), in the SW region of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), showed a discrepancy that is in need of an explanation. This study aims at better assessing possible uncertainties on the dust emission observed in the sample of GMCs from the SMC and focuses on the densest parts of the GMCs where CO is detected. New observations were obtained with the LABOCA camera on the APEX telescope. All GMCs previously observed in CO are detected and their emission at 870microns is compared to ancillary data. The different contributions to the sub-mmm emission are estimated, as well as dust properties, in order to deduce molecular cloud masses precisely. The (sub-)mm emission observed in the GMCs in the SW region of the SMC is dominated by dust emission and masses are deduced for the part of each cloud where CO is detected and compared to the virial masses. The mass discrepancy between both methods is confirmed at 870microns with the LABOCA observations: the virial masses are on average 4 times smaller than the masses of dense gas deduced from dust emission, contrary to what is observed for equivalent clouds in our Galaxy. The origin of this mass discrepancy in the SMC remains unkown. The direct interpretation of this effect is that the CO linewidth used to compute virial masses do not measure the full velocity distribution of the gas. Geometrical effects and uncertainties on the dust properties are also discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.