Paper detail

Labelling Vertebrae with 2D Reformations of Multidetector CT Images: An Adversarial Approach for Incorporating Prior Knowledge of Spine Anatomy

Purpose: To use and test a labelling algorithm that operates on two-dimensional (2D) reformations, rather than three-dimensional (3D) data to locate and identify vertebrae. Methods: We improved the Btrfly Net (described by Sekuboyina et al) that works on sagittal and coronal maximum intensity projections (MIP) and augmented it with two additional components: spine-localization and adversarial a priori-learning. Furthermore, we explored two variants of adversarial training schemes that incorporated the anatomical a priori knowledge into the Btrfly Net. We investigated the superiority of the proposed approach for labelling vertebrae on three datasets: a public benchmarking dataset of 302 CT scans and two in-house datasets with a total of 238 CT scans. We employed Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compute the statistical significance of the improvement in performance observed due to various architectural components in our approach. Results: On the public dataset, our approach using the described Btrfly(pe-eb) network performed on par with current state-of-the-art methods achieving a statistically significant (p < .001) vertebrae identification rate of 88.5+/-0.2 % and localization distances of less than 7-mm. On the in-house datasets that had a higher inter-scan data variability, we obtained an identification rate of 85.1+/-1.2%. Conclusion: An identification performance comparable to existing 3D approaches was achieved when labelling vertebrae on 2D MIPs. The performance was further improved using the proposed adversarial training regime that effectively enforced local spine a priori knowledge during training. Lastly, spine-localization increased the generalizability of our approach by homogenizing the content in the MIPs.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.