Paper detail

Labeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three

An $L(2, 1)$-labeling of a graph $G$ is an assignment of a nonnegative integer to each vertex of $G$ such that adjacent vertices receive integers that differ by at least two and vertices at distance two receive distinct integers. The span of such a labeling is the difference between the largest and smallest integers used. The $λ$-number of $G$, denoted by $λ(G)$, is the minimum span over all $L(2, 1)$-labelings of $G$. Bodlaender {\it et al.} conjectured that if $G$ is an outerplanar graph of maximum degree $Δ$, then $λ(G)\leq Δ+2$. Calamoneri and Petreschi proved that this conjecture is true when $Δ\geq 8$ but false when $Δ=3$. Meanwhile, they proved that $λ(G)\leq Δ+5$ for any outerplanar graph $G$ with $Δ=3$ and asked whether or not this bound is sharp. In this paper we answer this question by proving that $λ(G)\leq Δ+ 3$ for every outerplanar graph with maximum degree $Δ=3$. We also show that this bound $Δ+ 3$ can be achieved by infinitely many outerplanar graphs with $Δ=3$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.