Paper detail

L1-norm vs. L2-norm fitting in optimizing focal multi-channel tES stimulation: linear and semidefinite programming vs. weighted least squares

This study focuses on Multi-Channel Transcranial Electrical Stimulation, a non-invasive brain method for stimulating neuronal activity under the influence of low-intensity currents. We introduce mathematical formulation for finding a current pattern which optimizes a L1-norm fit between a given focal target distribution and volume current density inside the brain. L1-norm is well-known to favor well-localized or sparse distributions compared to L2-norm (least-squares) fitted estimates. We present a linear programming approach which performs L1-norm fitting and penalization of the current pattern (L1L1) to control the number of non-zero currents. The optimizer filters a large set of candidate solutions using a two-stage metaheuristic search in from a pre-filtered set of candidates. The numerical simulation results, obtained with both a 8- and 20-channel electrode montages, suggest that our hypothesis on the benefits of L1-norm data fitting is valid. As compared to L1-norm regularized L2-norm fitting (L1L2) via semidefinite programming and weighted Tikhonov least-squares method, the L1L1 results were overall preferable with respect to maximizing the focused current density at the target position and the ratio between focused and nuisance current magnitudes. We propose the metaheuristic L1L1 optimization approach as a potential technique to obtain a well-localized stimulus with a controllable magnitude at a given target position. L1L1 finds a current pattern with a steep contrast between the anodal and cathodal electrodes meanwhile suppressing the nuisance currents in the brain, hence, providing a potential alternative to modulate the effects of the stimulation, e.g., the sensation experienced by the subject.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.